Tag Archive | "Epilepsy"

FDA: Epilepsy drugs to carry warning of risk of suicidal action

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


US regulators announced Tuesday that the agency will require manufacturers of anti-epileptic drugs to add warnings on the labels about the risk of suicidality. In keeping with the recommendation of an FDA advisory panel in July, the labelling update will not involve a boxed warning.

The labelling update will indicate that about 1 in 500 patients taking the drugs faces an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviours, and will specify that the risks are similar for all anti-epileptic drugs. The new warning applies to 21 medications, including Johnson & Johnson’s Topamax, Pfizer’s Lyrica and Neurontin, GlaxoSmithKline’s Lamictal, and Novartis’ Tegretol and Trileptal. The FDA noted that the decision is “based on the agency’s review of 199 clinical trials of 11 anti-epileptic drugs which showed that patients receiving anti-epileptic drugs had almost twice the risk of suicidal behaviour or thoughts compared [with] patients receiving…placebo.”

Commenting on the news, GlaxoSmithKline spokesperson Sarah Alspach said that the company supports the decision to add information about suicide risks to its medication and will review the FDA action, but the drugmaker affirmed that it “remains confident in the overall safety and efficacy profile of Lamictal based on our extensive clinical trial experience and the experience of more than 5 million people worldwide.” Both Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer stated that the companies would work with US regulators to update the labelling on their respective treatments.

Source: FirstWord

Popularity: 14% [?]

Despite FDA Suicide Warning Epilepsy Experts Urge Patients And Caregivers To Continue Drug Therapy

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Medical specialists at the nation’s largest professional meeting on epilepsy discussed multiple questions and concerns they have about data presented by the FDA in support of its recent suicide alert on anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs) and the potential effect of the federal agency’s analyses on clinical practice and the way AED drug trials are to be conducted in the future.

It is well known that non-adherence to antiepileptic drug therapy can lead to a dramatic increase in accidents and deaths. For these reasons, epileptic experts believe it is imperative that patients continue their antiepileptic therapy to prevent the occurrence of serious accidents and death.

During the American Epilepsy Society’s annual meeting, epidemiologists, epileptologists and psychiatrists offered a critical review of the FDA’s methodology and analyses, describe the suicide alert’s potential impact on patient compliance and seizure management, and its likely effect on the selection of patients for AED regulatory studies.

Among the doctors’ concerns is that news reports of the FDA’s analyses have confused patients and, perhaps, some physicians on the risks associated with epilepsy drugs. They cite data showing that the risk of suicide possibly associated with AEDs is extremely small compared to the potential danger of leaving patients untreated. Also of concern is that epilepsy patients prone to suicidal ideation or behavior will be excluded from clinical trials of new AEDs.

The panel is seriously concerned about methodological flaws in the FDA’s data collection and analysis, including biased measurement of suicidality and exclusion of a large proportion of the data. The FDA performed similarly flawed analysis of the SSRIs. After the black box warning appeared, there was a decrease in use of the SSRIs with a corresponding increase in suicide, contrary to what the FDA’s conclusions would predict.

The discussion by leading experts was headed by Andres M. Kanner, M.D., professor of neurological sciences at Rush Medical Center and associate director of the Rush Epilepsy Center. The other panelist for the session, titled Suicidality and Epilepsy: A Complex Problem, are Dr. Hesdorffer (Columbia University), Anne T. Berg, Ph.D. (Northern Illinois University), John J. Barry, M.D. (Stanford University), Rochelle Caplan, M.D. (UCLA), and Jacqueline A. French, M.D. (New York University).

In addition to the panel presentation, the American Epilepsy Society submitted a letter to the FDA expressing its concern for potential misinterpretation by patients, families and physicians of package insert warnings. A copy of the letter is available at the AES website http://www.aesnet.org in the press room section.

About The American Epilepsy Society

The American Epilepsy Society (AES), based in West Hartford, CT, is among the oldest neurological professional organizations in the nation, with roots dating to 1898. The AES annual meeting is the world’s preeminent professional meeting on epilepsy and attracts some 4,000 participants from around the globe. The Society promotes research and education for professionals (epileptologists) dedicated to the prevention, treatment and cure of epilepsy. Membership includes epilepsy clinicians, basic science and clinical investigators, and other health-care professionals interested in seizure disorders.

Source: Medical News Today

Popularity: 15% [?]

New Keppra XR(TM) Data Highlight Its Role for Patients with Partial-Onset Seizures

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Studies Presented at American Epilepsy Society Annual Meeting

ATLANTA — UCB today announced findings from new studies of the once-daily antiepileptic drug (AED) Keppra XR(TM) (levetiracetam) extended-release tablets comparing tolerability versus levetiracetam immediate release (IR) and reporting on additional dosing schedules. The data were among five studies that were presented at the 62nd annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society (AES) in Seattle.

Keppra XR was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in September 2008 for use as adjunctive treatment for people with partial-onset seizures who are 16 years of age and older.

“In this new meta-analysis, patients taking Keppra XR experienced fewer nervous system side effects than those taking the same dose of twice daily levetiracetam,” said James Zackheim, Medical Director, CNS, UCB. “Keppra XR is the only once-daily, extended-release formulation of levetiracetam, and there is no generic alternative available.”

Summary of Keppra XR Data Presented at 2008 AES Annual Meeting

Safety Profile of Levetiracetam Extended Release Compared to Immediate Release: An Indirect Comparison Using a Meta-Analytic Approach

Researchers conducted a meta-analysis of Phase III data to determine whether Keppra XR is associated with any tolerability advantages versus the same daily dose of levetiracetam IR. According to the meta-analysis, patients taking Keppra XR once-daily had lower rates of some adverse events versus levetiracetam IR twice-daily.

– In terms of overall tolerability, 52.8% of Keppra XR patients reported any adverse event, compared with 79% of patients taking levetiracetam IR.

– While adverse events associated with levetiracetam IR were also observed with Keppra XR, patients treated with Keppra XR once-daily experienced statistically significantly lower rates of adverse events related to nervous system disorders (i.e., headache, somnolence and dizziness) versus levetiracetam IR twice-daily.

– Keppra XR-treated patients reported numerically lower rates of psychiatric disorders (i.e., nervousness, anxiety and depression) and nutrition/metabolism disorders.

–No other differences in rates of adverse events were statistically significant.

Poster Session 3, Monday, December 8, 8:00 am - 1:30 pm (Abstract 3.243)

Florent Richy, MPH, PhD, Soutrik Banerjee, MD, PhD, Christophe Gervasoni, MS, Patricia Grossman, PharmD, MBA, Sandra Helmers, MD

UCB Pharma, Inc.; University of Liege, Belgium; Joseph Fourier University, France; Stendhal University, France; Emory University Hospital, USA

Single Dose Bioequivalence between Levetiracetam 2 x 750 mg XR Tablets and 3 x 500 mg XR Tablets and Food Effect on 2 x 750 mg XR Tablets in Healthy Subjects

This study demonstrated that an investigational 750 mg tablet strength of Keppra XR is bioequivalent to the approved 500 mg tablet when these are each combined to achieve a 1,500 mg dose. Results show that a single dose of 2 x 750 mg Keppra XR tablets was bioequivalent to a 3 x 500 mg single dose of Keppra XR in healthy adults, and that food intake did not significantly modify Keppra XR 2 x 750 mg disposition.

– The median time to peak plasma concentration was approximately 4 to 5 hours for each dose.

– Each dose resulted in a similar half-life (the time required for half the quantity of a drug in the body to be metabolized or eliminated), apparent total clearance (the rate at which a drug in the body is metabolized or eliminated), and apparent total distribution (the amount of fluid that would be required to dissolve the total amount of drug needed to achieve the same concentration as that found in the blood).

– When the 2 x 750 mg Keppra XR dose was taken with food, the time to peak concentration was increased by 2 hours relative to fasted intake, while Cmax (the peak concentration of a drug in the body) remained within bioequivalence limits.

– For all three Keppra XR dosing schedules (3 x 500 mg, 2 x 750 fasted and 2 x 750 fed), tolerability was good and the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all groups; in addition, adverse events were virtually all mild, and all resolved by the end of the study.

Poster Session 3, Monday, December 8, 8:00 am - 1:30 pm (Abstract 3.239)

Christian Otoul, Elisabeth Rouits, Ingrid Burton, Evelyne Guenole, Mona Troenaru, Ans Valgaeren, Pierre Boulanger, Maria Laura Sargentini-Maier

UCB Pharma SA, Braine-L’Alleud, Belgium; Department of Pharmacokinetics, SGS Life Science Services, Wavre, Belgium; Therapharm Recherches, Caen, France

Additional Keppra XR Data Presented at 2008 AES Annual Meeting:

– Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam Extended-Release 500 mg Tablets

Poster Session 3, Monday, December 8, 8:00 am - 1:30 pm (Abstract 3.247)

Elisabeth Rouits, M. Lovern, Maria Laura Sargentini-Maier and Armel Stockis

UCB Pharma, Braine-L’Alleud, Belgium

– Population Dose-Response Modeling of Levetiracetam Extended- and Immediate-Release Formulations in Adults with Partial-Onset Seizures

Poster Session 3, Monday, December 8, 8:00 am - 1:30 pm (Abstract 3.25)

Rik Schoemaker, Eric Snoeck, Armel Stockis, Christian Otoul, Maria Laura Sargentini-Maier

Exprimo NV, Mechelen, Belgium; Pharmacometrics Department, UCB Pharma SA, Braine-L’Alleud, Belgium

– Dose-Proportionality of Levetiracetam 500 mg Extended-Release Tablets from 1 g to 3 g Once Daily

Poster Session 3, Monday, December 8, 8:00 am - 1:30 (Abstract 3.263)

Ans Valgaeren, Nathalie Toublanc, Ingrid Burton, Sandrine Gelu-Mantoulet, Mona Troenaru, Christian Otoul, Maria Laura Sargentini-Maier, Armel Stockis

UCB Pharma SA, Braine-L’Alleud, Belgium; Department of Pharmacokinetics, SGS Life Science Services, Wavre, Belgium; Therapharm Recherches, Caen, France

Keppra XR cannot be substituted with any IR levetiracetam or any other antiepileptic medication at the pharmacy counter without a physician’s approval.

Important Safety Information

Keppra XR(TM) extended-release tablets are indicated as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial onset seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy.

Keppra XR(TM) causes somnolence, dizziness, and behavioral abnormalities. The most common adverse reactions observed with Keppra XR(TM) in combination with other AEDs were somnolence and irritability.

The adverse reactions that may be seen in patients receiving Keppra XR(TM) are expected to be similar to those seen in patients receiving immediate-release Keppra(R) tablets.

Keppra(R) immediate-release tablets cause somnolence and fatigue, coordination difficulties, and behavioral abnormalities (e.g., psychotic symptoms, suicidal ideation, and other abnormalities), as well as hematological abnormalities. In adults experiencing partial onset seizures, the most common adverse reactions observed with Keppra(R) in combination with other AEDs were somnolence, asthenia, infection and dizziness.

Keppra XR(TM) should be gradually withdrawn to minimize the potential of increased seizure frequency.

Dosing must be individualized according to the patient’s renal function status. In patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, it is recommended that immediate-release Keppra(R) be used instead of Keppra XR(TM).

For full prescribing information, please see www.KeppraXR.com.

In order to ensure patient access to this valuable medication in the U.S., UCB is initiating a co-pay support program. For more information, contact U.S. UCB Medical Information at 1-866-822-0068 (press 9).

About Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder affecting approximately three million people in the U.S. — making it more common than multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease combined. It is caused by abnormal, excessive electrical discharges of the nerve cells, or neurons, in the brain. Epilepsy is characterized by a tendency to have recurrent seizures and defined by two or more unprovoked seizures. There are many different seizure types and epileptic syndromes. Forty percent of patients taking only one AED continue to experience seizures, and approximately 30% of patients taking adjunctive therapy continue to experience seizures. This highlights the ongoing need for the development of new AEDs. For more information about epilepsy, visit www.epilepsyfoundation.org, www.epilepsy.com, or www.epilepsyadvocate.com.

About UCB

UCB is a global leader in the biopharmaceutical industry dedicated to the research, development and commercialization of innovative medicines with a focus on the fields of central nervous system and immunology disorders. Employing approximately 12,000 people in more than 40 countries, UCB achieved revenue of 3.6 billion euro in 2007. UCB is listed on NYSE Euronext (symbol: UCB). Worldwide headquarters is located in Brussels, Belgium; U.S. headquarters is located in Atlanta, Georgia. For more information about UCB, visit www.ucb-group.com.

Forward looking statement

This press release contains forward-looking statements based on current plans, estimates and beliefs of management. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to be materially different from those that may be implied by such forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Important factors that could result in such differences include: changes in general economic, business and competitive conditions, effects of future judicial decisions, changes in regulation, exchange rate fluctuations and hiring and retention of its employees.

Source: UCB

Popularity: 12% [?]

Anavex presents potent neuroprotective effects of Anavex 1-41 at Neuroscience 2008

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (”ANAVEX”) (OTCBB), a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of novel therapeutics to treat Central Nervous System (CNS) diseases and cancer, was selected to present its latest results with ANAVEX 1-41 at Neuroscience 2008, the 38th annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, which took place November 15-19, 2008 in Washington, DC.

In a scientific poster abstract, ANAVEX detailed the outstanding neuroprotective potential of ANAVEX 1-41, evidenced by its ability to block the manifestation of the earliest toxic effects in a validated mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Currently in the late pre-clinical stage, ANAVEX 1-41 has shown synergistic potential for anti-amnesic and neuroprotective efficacy at extremely low doses. This is the first time these results have been attained by any pharmacological agent in an Alzheimer’s mouse model involving the injection of the amyloid-beta (25-35) peptide.

“We are excited by our ongoing progress in the development of ANAVEX 1-41 as it continues to demonstrate powerful neuroprotective action at extremely low doses with no toxicity,” said Dr. Vamvakides, Chief Scientific Officer of ANAVEX. “In addition, we believe that our latest findings have relevance for ANAVEX 2-73, another lead Alzheimer’s compound, as 1-41 and 2-73 have a common origin and similarities in mechanism of action.”

The earliest toxic effects of Alzheimer’s disease mouse models were measured by the expression of the caspase-12 marker. Caspase 12 is a recently discovered enzyme that indicates these early toxic effects. Non-transgenic Alzheimer’s mouse models are created by injecting amyloid-beta peptide (amyloid-beta 25-35) into mouse brains to bring on histological and biochemical changes, oxidative stress and learning deficits.

The neuroprotective potential of ANAVEX 1-41 is hypothesized to act by the compound’s ability to modulate sigma receptors which regulate calcium mobilization in neuronal cells. Calcium is regulated through the Inositol Triphosphate receptors “IP3R” and the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum “Ca2+/ATPase” pump.

The major effect of ANAVEX 1-41 occurs at the membrane of neuronal cells, in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The novel profile of ANAVEX 1-41, which is a mixed sigma-1, muscarinic and sodium-channel candidate drug, accounts for its ability to fight ER stress and thereby prevent apoptosis of the neuronal cells. This neuronal apoptosis is the prominent pathophysiological effect of brain degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease.

The neuroprotective effects of ANAVEX 1-41 were assessed in the hippocampus, the area of the brain that regulates learning, emotion and memory and which is highly implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. As recently discovered in pre-clinical testing, through its sigma-1 activity, ANAVEX 1-41 targets neuron structures (ER, mitochondria), as well as disturbed biochemical pathways and channels (UPR,IP3R,Bcl-2,apoptosis). Organizations involved in sigma receptor research, including ANAVEX, have determined that these are crucial factors in Alzheimer’s disease and in many other neurodegenerative diseases.

The company expects to complete pre-clinical trials on ANAVEX 1-41 in early 2009.

ANAVEX 1-41 and ANAVEX 2-73 share a common origin and related profile (congeners). ANAVEX is currently planning to prepare the Investigational New Drug (IND) (or IMPD) file to advance 2-73 to Phase 1 human clinical trials, which are expected to begin in 2009.

A copy of the poster abstract, titled “The neuroprotective action of ligands acting at the sigma-1 chaperone protein involves regulation of the expression of IP3 receptor subtypes and SerCa pumps,” can be viewed on the company’s web site at http://www.anavex.com/sfn08.html. The authors are Vanessa Villard, Fanny Malhaire-Ferreux, Francois Monnet, Alexandre Vamvakides and Tangui Maurice.

About Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (www.anavex.com) is an emerging biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of novel drug targets for the treatment of cancer and neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s, epilepsy and depression. The company’s proprietary SIGMACEPTOR(TM) Discovery Platform involves the rational design of drug compounds that fulfill specific criteria based on unmet market needs and new scientific advances. Selected drug candidates demonstrate high, non-exclusive affinity for sigma receptors, which are involved in the modulation of multiple cellular biochemical signaling pathways.

ANAVEX’s SIGMACEPTOR(TM)-N program involves the development of novel and original drug candidates that target neurological and neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, depression, pain). The company’s lead drug candidates exhibit high, non-exclusive affinity for sigma receptors with strong evidence for anti-amnesic, neuroprotective, anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-convulsive, anti-depressant and anxiolytic properties. The company believes that oxidative stress, not amyloid-beta, is the cause of Alzheimer’s. ANAVEX 1-41 and ANAVEX 2-73 modulate sigma receptors, a unique class of receptor molecules, to guard against oxidative stress and repair cells compromised by its effects. So far, through the advanced pre-clinical phase of development, the compounds have performed extremely well in well-recognized animal models of Alzheimer’s disease, underscoring the promise of the company’s new alternative approach to the disease.

ANAVEX SIGMACEPTOR(TM)-C program involves the development of novel and original drug candidates targeting cancer. The company’s lead drug candidates exhibit high, non-exclusive affinity for sigma receptors with strong evidence for selective pro-apoptotic, anti-metastatic and low toxicity properties in various types of solid cancers such as colon, prostate, breast and lung. ANAVEX 7-1037 has already demonstrated its ability to significantly delay the growth of cancerous tumors in patient-derived xenografts during advanced pre-clinical studies.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this press release that are not strictly historical in nature are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions based on current information and expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from those projected in any of such statements due to various factors, including the risks and uncertainties inherent in drug discovery and development, which include, without limitation, the potential failure of development candidates to advance through preclinical studies or demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical testing and the ability to file an IND or commence clinical studies. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. This caution is made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement and Anavex Life Sciences Corp. undertakes no obligation to revise or update this press release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

Source: Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Popularity: 21% [?]

FDA Approves New Drug for Severe Epilepsy

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,


Trials showed Banzel proved effective against Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

A new drug called Banzel (rufinamide) has been approved as a supplementary treatment for a severe form of epilepsy called Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Friday.

The approval was based on results of a four-month clinical trial that included patients ages 4 to 30. Compared to patients who took a placebo, those who took the drug had 41 percent fewer tonic plus atonic seizures and 20 percent fewer seizures of any type, the agency said in a news release.

Common side effects included headache, dizziness, fatigue, drowsiness, double vision, nausea, vomiting, and problems walking.

As with all other antiepileptic drugs, Banzel will carry a warning that it may increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behaviors. All patients who take Banzel must be given a patient medication guide that describes the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors associated with this class of drugs, the FDA said.

Banzel, manufactured by Eisai Medical Research Inc. of Woodcliff Lake, N.J., was granted “orphan drug status” by the FDA. This designation is given to a drug intended to treat a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United States.

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome usually begins before age 4 and can be caused by brain malformations, severe head injury, central nervous system infection and inherited degenerative or metabolic conditions. No cause can be found in 30 percent to 35 percent of cases, the FDA said.

Patients with this form of epilepsy may experience periods of frequent seizures mixed with brief, relatively seizure-free periods. They suffer from varying types of seizures, including tonic (stiffening of the body, upward deviation of the eyes, dilation of the pupils, and altered respiratory patterns), atonic (brief loss of muscle tone and consciousness, causing abrupt falls), atypical absence (staring spells), and myoclonic (sudden muscle jerks).

Most children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome have some degree of impaired intellectual functioning or information processing, as well as developmental delays and behavioral issues.

“This approval offers another treatment option for patients who suffer from these debilitating, severe seizures,” Dr. Russell Katz, director of the division of neurology products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the news release.

Source: U.S. Health News

Popularity: 15% [?]

‘Sticky cell’ clues to epilepsy

Tags: , , , , ,


A faulty immune reaction may be responsible for the development of epilepsy, research suggests.

Studies in mice by US and Italian researchers linked seizures to brain changes which made immune cells stick inside its blood vessels.

This, in turn, the journal Nature Medicine reported, helped break down a vital filter which protects the brain from harmful chemicals.

“Unsticking” these cells helped prevent the development of epilepsy in mice.

Recent research has focused on problems with the “blood brain barrier” as a possible key to epilepsy, which, if poorly controlled, can mean regular and potentially damaging seizures.

Many molecules circulating in the bloodstream could cause damage if they reach the brain, and the role of the barrier is to keep them away.

The loss of the barrier is known to be connected to the “excitability” of neurons which may be the trigger for epileptic seizures, but the root cause of why the barrier could be breached remains mysterious.

The latest research may have found how an initial, non-epileptic, seizure could lead to a lifetime of epilepsy.

It looked at the behaviour of white blood cells - leukocytes - whose job it is to defend the body from threats such as bacteria and viruses.

The scientists found that, in mice at least, the initial seizure caused the release of a body chemical within the blood vessels which increased the “adhesion” of leukocytes, keeping them in the vessels for longer.

Normally, the mice would then go on to develop full epilepsy, but when this “stickiness” chemical was blocked using antibodies or by genetically changing the mice, the frequency of subsequent seizures was markedly reduced.

Analysis of brain tissue from people with epilepsy found a far greater abundance of leukocytes than in those without the condition, adding further weight to the idea.

The researchers suggested that drugs targeting this “stickiness” might be a good way of preventing, or perhaps even treating, epilepsy in humans.

Existing drugs

Professor Matthew Walker, a neuroscientist from University College London, and a member of Epilepsy Research UK’s scientific advisory board, said the research was “interesting and exciting”.

“It provides a further piece of evidence for a breakdown in the blood brain barrier in the development of epilepsy.”

He said it was possible that the “stickiness” of immune cells contributed to the development of epilepsy in previously unaffected people who suffered brain injuries, strokes or prolonged seizures.

While it was not clear whether this same mechanism was at work in humans, it might reveal a “whole new range” of drug targets.

“Importantly there are already drugs in use that may target this process, but which have not been tested in epilepsy and so this study could lead to trials of novel treatments for epilepsy in the near future.”

Source: BBC NEWS

Popularity: 12% [?]

UCSD and drug maker establish partnership

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


UCSD and Johnson & Johnson have agreed to collaborate on research and educational programs, offering the latest example of growing ties between drug manufacturers and medical or scientific institutions that want to more quickly turn lab work into new treatments.

Officials for the University of California San Diego announced yesterday that they signed a memorandum of understanding Nov. 13 with Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, an arm of the drug giant that operates a laboratory in San Diego.

The two-page agreement covers the university’s medical school, health sciences division, Moores Cancer Center and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.

It should speed the time required to ink formal agreements for launching each joint project, officials from UCSD and Johnson & Johnson said. Those projects likely would be in the field of translational medicine – transforming basic lab discoveries into drugs, medical devices and other therapies.

“It can be a very long process, going back and forth between lawyers,” said Dr. Gary Firestein, dean of translational medicine at UCSD. “If you have predetermined language, you can knock many months off negotiations.”

JOHNSON & JOHNSON

History: Founded in 1886. Now the world’s largest health care company, with more than 250 subsidiary companies in 57 countries.

Employees: Nearly 120,000.

Headquarters: New Brunswick, N.J.

Branches: Has a research and development office in San Diego.

Areas of research: Include drugs for Alzheimer’s disease, anemia, autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, heart disease, schizophrenia, epilepsy and migraine headaches.

UCSD HEALTH SCIENCES DIVISION

Employees: More than 9,000.

Locations: Major campuses in Hillcrest and La Jolla.

Revenue: $1.4 billion in fiscal 2008.

Funding: About $456 million from government and private sources to pay for health-science studies.

Areas of research: Include cancer, heart disease, infectious diseases, neurosciences, immunology, diabetes, genetics, psychiatric disorders, pharmacology and stem cells.

Translational efforts not only can help patients but also generate revenue for institutions, researchers and medical companies that end up marketing the new products.

Under the first agreement reached through the local partnership, UCSD pharmacology professor Larry Brunton will conduct experiments using a new drug created by Johnson & Johnson to treat heart failure.

Brunton will study rats to determine how the medication’s biomechanics affect heart muscles, he said yesterday. Johnson & Johnson will give about $75,000 in funding.

Federal drug regulators told Johnson & Johnson it had to conduct the experiments before seeking permission to test the drug on humans, Brunton said.

The company’s collaboration with UCSD was born out of Brunton’s friendship with Nigel Shankley and Peter Gengo, researchers developing the drug at Johnson & Johnson’s lab in San Diego.

“I have this expertise that Johnson & Johnson lacks,” Brunton said.

Leaders at the two organizations decided to create a broader relationship that would provide a framework for more collaboration.

“We have complementary skills and expertise,” said Dr. G. Diego Miralles, chief medical officer of the local Johnson & Johnson lab. “We are next-door neighbors. It’s a natural development that we reach out to each other.”

Johnson & Johnson is the world’s biggest health care company. It invested $5.3 billion in pharmaceutical research for new medications last year.

UCSD has more than 400 clinical trials under way for heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, nutrition and other medical issues.

The partnership could lead to more joint research efforts, consultations, clinical trials and training opportunities for students at the Johnson & Johnson lab, said officials for the university and drug company.

They said it was too early to know how much money might be exchanged between the parties.

Similar relationships have been lucrative for other research institutes in the area.

This year, the French drug company Ipsen agreed to give the nonprofit Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla about $10 million over the next three to five years to help fund research.

The Scripps Research Institute, also in La Jolla, agreed to accept $100 million from Pfizer two years ago. In exchange, it gave the drug maker the right to license nearly half of its discoveries over the next five years.

The collaborations come at a time when many pharmaceutical companies are struggling to produce new blockbuster drugs on their own and government-funded institutes are searching for ways to get their discoveries into the private market more rapidly.

“Pharmaceutical company pipelines are essentially dry,” said Joe Panetta executive director of Biocom, which represents the San Diego life-sciences industry. “At the same time . . . the (National Institutes of Health) has said that money going into basic research can’t only have an academic focus, that there should be some evidence that the work will result in therapeutics.”

Public-private partnerships also offer a hedge against stagnant or shrinking government funding for medical and scientific research, said Tony Mazzaschi, interim chief science officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Not everyone likes the increasing coziness. Some critics said the pacts could let drug companies profit by cherry-picking research at institutes mainly funded by taxpayers and by steering research efforts toward goals that are more profitable to industry and less beneficial for patients.

Source: SignOnSanDiego.com

Popularity: 19% [?]

Gene Associated With Epilepsy Discovered

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,


A University of Iowa-led international research team has found a new gene associated with the brain disorder epilepsy. While the PRICKLE1 gene mutation was specific to a rare form of epilepsy, the study results could help lead to new ideas for overall epilepsy treatment.

The findings, which involved nearly two dozen institutions from six different countries, appear in the Nov. 7 issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics.

In epilepsy, nerve cells in the brain signal abnormally and cause repeated seizures that can include strange sensations, severe muscle spasms and loss of consciousness. The seizures may not have lasting effects but can affect activities, such as limiting a person’s ability to drive. Most seizures do not cause brain damage but some types of epilepsy lead to physical disabilities and cognitive problems. Medications can control symptoms, but there is no cure.

“The study results were surprising not only because the PRICKLE1 gene had never been associated with epilepsy but also because the gene was not associated with any other human disease,” said the study’s lead author Alex Bassuk, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine and a pediatric neurologist with University of Iowa Children’s Hospital.

The nine families involved in the study all lived in the Middle East and came from one of three family lines. Of the 47 individuals in the three family lines, 23 had a form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy accompanied by ataxia — a condition that causes imbalance.

One family line has been extensively described by Hatem El-Shanti, M.D., a University of Iowa adjunct professor of pediatrics who now leads genetics research for the country of Qatar. The two other family lines had been researched by Sam Berkovic, M.D., at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

“By sharing and analyzing data sets, we realized there was a common mutation in the PRICKLE1 gene in the family members with this form of epilepsy,” Bassuk said.

To verify that the mutation might be related to the epilepsy, the team needed to test it in an animal model. This next step to find a suitable animal model involved a surprising coincidence: Bassuk, who had only recently joined the UI, realized through online research that the PRICKLE1 gene in zebrafish had been previously identified by another University of Iowa researcher, Diane Slusarki, Ph.D., associate professor of biology in the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.

“I walked across the river to Diane’s side of campus, and we designed an experiment to test the human mutation in the zebrafish,” Bassuk said. It was ‘Iowa luck.’”

Slusarki and Bassuk’s collaboration revealed that the mutated PRICKLE1 gene does not behave normally in zebrafish. Bassuk noted that collaboration, whether on-campus or international, was essential to the success of the research study.

“We never could have done, or could continue to do this type of research, with just one person thinking about it,” he said. “From the clinicians who found and took histories on the study participants, to antibody testing at Stanford University to DNA shared from colleagues in Japan, the study required a lot of collaboration and coordination. And of course, we greatly appreciated the participation of the Mideastern families.”

Bassuk, and colleagues are now developing other animal models to investigate how PRICKLE1 gene is involved in epilepsy, and are investigating whether PRICKLE1 mutations are involved in the general population of patients with epilepsy. With that information, there is potential to develop new drugs for people with different forms of epilepsy in the general population, as well as for the study participants with the disease.

Source: ScienceDaily

Popularity: 21% [?]

Brain Teasers

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Researching drugs for neurological drugs can be a very dicey affair, considering the mushrooming R&D costs and expensive failures, especially in the case of orphan neurological disorders. Aashruti Kak provides an update on the status of drug development across neurological disorders

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are affected by neurological disorders. Due to the incredibly high global prevalence of these disorders the scope of research in the neurology segment is infinite for researchers and highly profitable for pharmaceutical companies.

As per Ramaraju Nallaparaju, Consultant, Healthcare Consulting, Datamonitor, India, in 2007, the global neurology market was worth $34.5 billion. Of the seven major markets, which account for 74 per cent ($25.5 billion) of the global market, US market was the largest with 64.5 per cent share ($16,434 million). The five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) had 27 per cent ($6,882 million) and JapanUS and the five EU markets have shown strong growth over the period 2004-07. However, with a CAGR of only 0.5 per cent , the Japanese market has remained flat over the same period. The top five neurological drugs companies-as measured in terms of 2007 revenues in the seven major markets-account for just over 43per cent of the total $34.50 billion 2007 neurological drug sales. accounted for 8.5 per cent ($2,178 million). Both the

“The central nervous system (CNS) market in India is estimated to be around Rs 1,200 crore ($275 million), with major players in this segment being Sun Pharmaceuticals, Torrent Pharma, Abbot India, and Lundbeck India. Other players which are making major inroads into this market are Intas Pharmaceuticals, Micro and Sanofi-Synthelabo India, USV and Elder Pharmaceuticals,” says Nallaparaju.

Common disorders

Common neurological disorders include epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, insomnia, cerebrovascular diseases including stroke, migraine and other headache disorders, neuroinfections, brain tumours, traumatic disorders of the nervous system such as brain trauma, and neurological disorders as a result of malnutrition. The existing therapies for the some of the disorders are as follows:

Epilepsy-Epilepsy can be controlled with medication, but not cured, although surgery may be considered in difficult cases. There are about 12-14 drugs available in the market to treat epilepsy, which is characterised by recurrent unprovoked seizures-transient signs and/or symptoms due to abnormal, excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. “Sodium valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, topiramate and leveritacetam (last three being newer drugs) are some of the most commonly used treatments. These drugs may work for some and not for others. Often even the newer drugs fail,” says Dr Joy Desai, Consultant Neurologist, Jaslok Hospital, Mumbai.

Multiple sclerosis (MS)-MS is an auto immune brain targeted inflammatory disease in which the body’s immune system changes and identifies the brain structures as being foreign, and therefore it attacks it. “MS may cause attacks that may lead to numbness is limbs, paralysis, visual, urinary or speech problems. So during the acute attack you are supposed to suppress it by giving an immunosuppressant, which commonly is intravenous (IV) steroids, which helps for the time being but after a few months the attacks recur someplace else in the body,” informs Desai. Every attack leaves behind a disability which may be profound and may disallow a person from normal vision, imbalance etc. He adds, “To make sure that these recurring attacks die down you need an immunomodulator, which modulates the immune system such that it stops attacking itself too often. In the case of MS, immunomodulators that are currently in use are interferons.”

Alzheimer’s disease-The basic reason why Alzheimer’s disease occurs is due to the depletion of a chemical called acetylcholine in the fundamental circuits that sub serve memory registration and retrieval. And if you supplement a drug that can augment the amount of acetylcholine in the brain then memory improves. “There is no absolute cure, but there are three medications that have been licensed for treatment to help their symptoms of the disease-rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine,” says Desai. Aricept (donepezil hydrochloride), produced by Eisai and co-marketed with Pfizer, was the first drug to be licensed in the UK specifically for Alzheimer’s disease, followed by Exelon (rivastigmine) by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Reminyl (galantamine), co-developed by Shire Pharmaceuticals and the Janssen Research Foundation, and Ebixa (memantine), produced by Merz and marketed in Europe by Lundbeck, which is the newest of the Alzheimer’s drugs.

Parkinson’s disease-Treatment for Parkinson’s has evolved considerably over the last three decades. Existing treatments day can improve symptoms, delay onset of total physical dependence, hence delaying morbidity and mortality, which result due to progressive immobility. Levodopa (also called L-dopa) is the most commonly prescribed and most effective medication for controlling the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, particularly bradykinesia (slow movement) and rigidity. L-dopa is taken in combination with carbidopa (Sinemet) to increase its effectiveness and prevent or lessen side effects. Other treatments are dopamine agonists (Parlodel, Permax, Requip, Mirapex)-that activate dopamine receptor-taken alone or in combination with sinemet. Requip and Mirapex are newer medications, which are safer and more effective than the older drugs, Parlodel and Permax. Symmetrel, anticholinergics (artane, cogentin), eldepryl or deprenyl, Tasmar and Comtan (COMT Inhibitors) are other treatments for Parkinson’s.

Orphan neurological disorders-Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS/Motor neuron disease) and Huntington’s disease (HD) are two orphan neurological disorders. ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease and Maladie de Charcot, is a progressive neurodegenerative disease associated with the loss of upper and lower motor neurons. “Sanofi-Aventis’s Rilutek (riluzole) is the leading drug for ALS. Rilutek accounted for 84 per cent of the total ALS market value in 2006, across the seven major markets. Other drug classes, such as antidepressants and antispasm agents, are prescribed to treat specific symptoms and co-morbidities,” informs Nallaparaju.

HD, on the other hand, is an autosomal dominant, inherited, neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatry disease which gives rise to progressive motor, cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Nallaparaju says, “Current pharmacological therapy of HD is limited to the management or alleviation of associated neurobehavioral or movement abnormalities. The market is almost entirely composed of off-label prescribing of narcoleptics, antidepressants and anti-Parkinson’s drugs. Due to the comparatively cheap and highly genericised nature of these drug classes, the value in the six major markets (US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) reached only $24 million in 2007.”

Top 10 neurological brands in the seven major markets (based on the last three quarter sales in 2006) are-Aricept for Alzheimer’s (patent expiring in 2010); Topamax for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008); Lamictal for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008); Ambien for insomnia (patent expired); Depakote for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008); Avonex for MS (patent expiring in 2013); Lyrica for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2018), Copaxone for MS (patent expiring in 2014); Imitrex for migraine (patent expiring in 2008); and Kepprafor epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008. With some drug patents expiring this year and in the near future, the prospects of getting cheaper, and hence, more accessibility are bright.

“Among the top 10 neurological brands across the seven major markets, the leading drug class is anticonvulsants (Topamax, Lamictal, Depakote, Lyrica and Keppra). These are also approved for a number of psychiatric and pain indications, which significantly broadens their target patient population,” says Nallaparaju. Among the anticonvulsants, Pfizer’s Lyrica is the fastest growing neurological drug with a CAGR of approximately 400 per cent (2004-2007) and it sustained this rapid growth in 2006-07 with an annual growth of 50.7 per cent . “Five of the top 10 products are getting off-patent this year. With formulation and development expertise, global presence, and competitive pricing, Indian companies are poised to target the $8.8 billion market of these five drugs getting genericised,” he adds.

Current ongoing research

“For epilepsy, we are doing clinical research for new drugs, mostly because there are patients that need them following the failure of standard treatments. These trials are sponsored by UCB,” reveals Desai. “We have a new anti-epileptic drug called brivaracetam (generic), which is a new compound developed by UCB. Right now we are doing phase III for brivaracetam for epilepsy patients who are not responding to standard treatment,” he adds. The drug may be put up for FDA licensing in 2010, so it might come into the market internationally by 2011. Johnson & Johnson is also developing a drug called carisbamate that it thinks is very promising, which may hit the market by 2010.

For MS there are newer immunomodulators that may be available two or three years from now. “There is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) called tysabri (natalizumab), which is undergoing studies in Europe and the US. Initially, when the drug was developed, there were two patients who had a very disastrous side effect and died-a condition called progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). It has not happened again but it can be considered as a possible side effect. In all likelihood the drug will still get licensed,” says Desai.

There is a vaccine that is being studied for Alzheimer’s-beta amyloid vaccine. There is an abnormal deposition of a protein called beta amyloid (present in many structures of the nervous system) which, in Alzheimer’s, goes under a structural change and gets deposited as a pathological process and forms what is known as neuritic plaque. So to target this part of the pathology researchers are trying to target a vaccine which can block the beta amyloid from getting deposited in the brain. However, according to a recent study by researchers in University of California (in the Journal of Neuroscience), the vaccine does what it is designed to do-clear beta-amyloid plaques from the brain-but does not seem to help restore lost learning and memory abilities, hence the need for complementary treatments that would be able to address the complexity of Alzheimer’s disease.

Another significant development in Alzheimer’s R&D is the recent liscencing deal between Pfizer and Medivation (a San Fransisco based biopharmaceutical company) to co-develop and market Medivation’s drug Dimebon for Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease, which is currently in phase III trials. The results from the study should be out by 2010.

In mid 2007, a study featured in the journal Nature stated that a team of researchers at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine had found that isradipine, a drug widely used for hypertension and stroke, could restore dopamine neurons to their original healthy state in mice, hence benefiting susceptible cases of Parkinson’s as well as those who are already affected by the disease. Another drug has been very recently found to slow the progression of Parkinson’s. Researchers from Newcastle University found that rasagiline (also known as Azilect) can slow the development of the disease if given at an early stage. Both the above mentioned studies cannot be termed as conclusive; however, they do raise expectations of a new treatment for the disease.

There any other known and promising neurological drugs as well that are currently undergoing clinical trials in various companies.

Issues and trends

There are quite a few issues and limitations that pharma companies face in the R&D of neurological drugs across disorders. “Considering that among the top 10 products five of them are getting off-patent this year, new drug launches in the same therapy classes of these drugs are bound to get affected,” reveals Nallaparaju. He continues, “The reduced cash flow (from lower revenue realisation) will adversely affect investments in R&D. There are chances of potential failure in the clinical trials, and availability of limited patient population (for recruiting in trials) of ALS and Huntington’s disease.” Additionally, he says that since novel therapies like cell therapy/gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease are still in initial stages of development, it is likely that there would be regulatory resistance to the acceptance of such novel therapies.

There have also been controversies regarding the teratogenicity of some of the neurological drugs. For instance, carbamazepine has a potential teratogenic risk. A number of reports have described a slight increase in the risk of major congenital abnormalities, especially neural tube defects, among children of mothers with epilepsy treated with carbamazepine during pregnancy. If women are treated with a combination of carbamazepine and other anti-epileptic drugs, particularly sodium valproate, there is an increased risk without any doubt.

A new trend that is surfacing is the overlap of neurology and psychiatry, because of which there may be a dual approach required/implemented soon to deal with neurological disorders. “Because some of the psychiatric drugs are being used off-label in neurological disorders, this is quite possible. Also, some psychiatric drugs will be used in these conditions for the co-morbidities that the patients may be present with,” says Nallaparaju.

Desai concurs, ” Most of the anti epileptics are being used by psychiatrists to treat bipolar mood disorder based on the theory that bipolar depression is a sort of limbic epilepsy (epilepsy of emotions).” For example, sodium valproate is used off-licence by specialists as a mood stabiliser for treating people with the psychiatric illness, bipolar affective disorder. This use is not licensed, but the medicine has been shown to be effective for controlling episodes of mania in this condition, and for helping prevent future episodes of ill health. To understand better cases like how sodium valproate works as a mood stabiliser in bipolar disorder, neurologists and psychiatrists ought to work together.

Unmet needs

Globally, about 94 companies are developing products for various neurological disorders. From amongst them, some Indian companies like Glenmark are developing drugs for indications like migraine (pipeline drug-GRC6211). Glenmark has partnered with Eli-Lilly for development deals. Suven Life sciences has also partnered with Eli-Lilly.

As neurological disorders are age-related, an increasing ageing population will drive the growth of the market, and hence the R&D. The following indications posses high levels of unmet needs:

Alzheimer’s disease affects approximately 24 million people worldwide today, with the number predicted to reach 40 million by 2020. Further, current therapy has a modest symptomatic effect and does not significantly modify the course of this progressive neuro-degenerative disorder

There is a significant need for an MS treatment with superior efficacy to current therapies with a less invasive and less time-consuming route of administration. There is also an unmet need for primary-progressive and secondary-progressive MS indications

There is also need for a reduced dosing frequency or a less invasive therapy with good patient compliance

In novel therapies for Parkinson’s like cell therapy/gene therapy, initial studies have shown significant results in slowing the progression of the disease, this area needs to be explored more extensively.

Searching for the ‘Ideal’

“Philosophically, I think most disease cannot be reversed, you can only buy time. The key to developing new drugs for these disorders is to know what goes wrong and try to formulate a fix,” says Desai. He adds, “The problem in degenerative disease is that we only know what happens as an end result, but we haven’t yet understood what initiates it. If one can find the initiative event that triggers the disease chain, we can come close to finding a better treatment if not a cure.”

Each drug is different. Desai says, “We need a medication that can be given orally and at the same time can pass the blood brain barrier and reach the nervous system to the target because the target is itself protected by the blood brain barrier.” Another attribute can be that the drug should be specifically targeted, act only at the site where it is needed, for example it should only augment acetylcholine in the brain where it is needed and not else where in the body and produce side effects. “A drug that can reach the nervous system without losing its potency and has minimum side effects is what you are looking for,” he says. Unfortunately, neurological diseases are so many that it will be difficult to form a common umbrella to give attributes to a drug and call it ‘ideal’.

Source: Express Healthcare

Popularity: 100% [?]

GlaxoSmithKline plans to close UK plant

Tags: , , , , ,


GlaxoSmithKline announced Tuesday that the company plans to close its Dartford manufacturing plant by 2013, a move that would result in the elimination of about 620 jobs. The drugmaker stated that it expects a decline in demand for the facility’s two largest products, which account for 60 percent of production at the site.

The company noted that the plant manufactures a number of older products, including epilepsy drug Lamictal, which lost patent protection in the US in July, and herpes treatment Valtrex, which loses patent protection in 2009. Claire Brough, a spokesperson for the drugmaker, noted that the move is part of an ongoing restructuring programme.

The latest job cuts follow an announcement by GlaxoSmithKline last week regarding plans to reduce its US sales force by approximately 1000 jobs.

Source: FirstWord

Popularity: 20% [?]

Site Sponsors