Tag Archive | "Donepezil"

Can Eisai’s new Alzheimer’s drug fill blockbuster shoes?

Tags: , , , , , ,


Eisai and Pfizer rolled out a new set of clinical trial numbers on their long-acting version of Aricept (donepezil), with the experimental 23 milligram extended-release formulation besting the 10 milligram immediate-release drug that the Japanese company relies on for the lion’s share of its U.S. revenue.

In a study which enrolled 1,476 patients, researchers said that the once-daily 23 milligram therapy proved more effective in maintaining and improving brain function than the marketed drug, according to a report from Bloomberg. Eisai faces a July 24 PDUFA date on its FDA application for the long-acting form of Aricept. Data on a patch version of the drug will be submitted this month.

Eisai has a lot riding on these new formulations. Aricept, the world’s best-selling Alzheimer’s drug, provides the company with 60 percent of its U.S. revenue but loses patent protection in November, a milestone that will be followed by a rapid loss in sales. A host of new Alzheimer’s therapies are now being studied as developers attempt to do more than treat symptoms of the disease.

Aricept garnered $3.64 billion in sales during the last fiscal year, but Eisai says it expects sales to swiftly plunge by 50 percent once it loses patent protection. The Japanese pharma company says its long-acting version should earn $600 million a year once it reaches its peak.

Source: FierceBiotech

Popularity: 2% [?]

FDA Approves First Generic Version of Pfizer and Eisai’s Alzheimer Drug

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


FDA approved the first generic versions of Alzheimer drug Aricept (donepezil hydrochloride) orally disintegrating tablets. Donepezil hydrochloride is indicated for the treatment of dementia related to Alzheimer disease. The new generic tablets, manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceutical, have been approved in 5 mg and 10 mg strengths.

[ad]

In the U.S., Japan, and key markets in Europe, the product is co-promoted by Eisai and Pfizer. Pfizer reported $482 million in year-end revenue from Aricept for 2008 and $311 million for the first nine months of 2009.

Aricept was discovered and developed by Eisai and approved by the FDA in 1996. It is a once-a-day treatment for mild, moderate, and severe Alzheimer disease. Studies showed Aricept treats Alzheimer symptoms, slowing the loss of overall function and improving cognition.

Source: GEN News

Popularity: 5% [?]

NICE final appraisal upholds decision on Alzheimer’s drugs

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence issued a final appraisal determination Thursday which upheld an earlier decision by the agency to limit access to Pfizer’s and Eisai’s Aricept (donepezil), Novartis’ Exelon (rivastigmine) and Shire’s Reminyl (galantamine) on the NHS to patients with moderate forms of Alzheimer’s disease.

[ad]

NICE Chief Executive Andrew Dillon said that the decision was made after releasing for consultation “the executable version of the economic model used in this appraisal” and after the consideration of comments made by consultees. He explained that “although these comments resulted in minor changes to the model, our independent advisory committee concluded that these were not enough to make these treatments a cost-effective use of NHS resources in the mild stages of the disease.” A legal challenge by Pfizer and Eisai had resulted in a UK Court of Appeal ruling last year that NICE’s guidance process for the Alzheimer’s drugs was “procedurally unfair,” and the court suggested that the agency release details of its cost-effectiveness model.

The final appraisal also provides guidance for Lundbeck’s Ebixa (memantine), which NICE noted “is not recommended as a treatment option for patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer’s disease except as part of well-designed clinical studies.” The companies have until July 1 to appeal the appraisal.

Source: FirstWord

Popularity: 7% [?]

Eisai to review Aricept partnership with Pfizer

Tags: , , , , , ,


Eisai indicated Thursday that it will start discussions with Pfizer about reviewing contract terms of the companies’ partnership for Aricept (donepezil) in light of Pfizer’s planned $68-billion acquisition of Wyeth. The Japanese drugmaker, which suggested last week that it would have the right to terminate the agreement once the merger is complete, expressed confidence about the Alzheimer’s disease treatment’s sales even without Pfizer’s contribution.

[ad]

Soichi Matsuno, the company’s deputy president of global pharmaceuticals, said that Eisai is working on plans to sell Aricept in markets where Pfizer is currently the sole promoter, and that “there’s no worry about Aricept sales in key countries such as Japan, the US, the UK, Germany and France because we have acquired skills through the joint promotion of more than 10 years.” Meanwhile, Pfizer stated that Eisai does not have legal grounds to terminate the agreement, adding it will oppose efforts to do so.

In related news, Eisai also reported financial results for the year ended March 31, during which Aricept sales climbed 4.4 percent to 303.8 billion Japanese yen ($3.2 billion), compared to the prior year. The company posted net income of 47.7 billion yen ($498.3 million), which was in line with consensus estimates, up from a prior-year period loss of 17 billion yen ($177.6 million). Overall revenue totalled 781.7 billion yen ($8.2 billion), compared with 734.3 billion yen ($7.7 billion) recorded for the year ended March 31, 2008.

Source: FirstWord

Popularity: 4% [?]

Pfizer to focus on biotechnology: CEO

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


In an interview with the Chicago Tribune, Pfizer CEO Jeffrey Kindler said that in the future, the company will focus more on treating unmet medical conditions with biotechnology, and will concentrate less on blockbuster drugs. He stated that “the dependence on a couple of large blockbuster products is not a good model…Having a diverse business portfolio is very prudent.”

[ad]

Pfizer, which agreed last month to acquire Wyeth for $68 billion, is focusing on biotechnology-derived vaccines and therapies for diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer’s, rather than on drugs for cholesterol, depression and hypertension. Kindler noted that “if Pfizer of the past was best known for a few very large blockbuster drugs, then the new Pfizer is vastly more diversified.” The CEO also remarked that Wyeth’s technologies are as good as those of rival biotechnology companies Amgen and Genentech, if not better.

The executive suggested that Wyeth’s platform for treating Alzheimer’s disease in different ways will be a benefit to Pfizer, which already markets the drug Aricept (donepezil) for the condition. Kindler commented that “when you come to something like Alzheimer’s, it becomes more of an effort to try different things to succeed.”

Source: FirstWord

Popularity: 9% [?]

Brain Teasers

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Researching drugs for neurological drugs can be a very dicey affair, considering the mushrooming R&D costs and expensive failures, especially in the case of orphan neurological disorders. Aashruti Kak provides an update on the status of drug development across neurological disorders

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are affected by neurological disorders. Due to the incredibly high global prevalence of these disorders the scope of research in the neurology segment is infinite for researchers and highly profitable for pharmaceutical companies.

[ad]

As per Ramaraju Nallaparaju, Consultant, Healthcare Consulting, Datamonitor, India, in 2007, the global neurology market was worth $34.5 billion. Of the seven major markets, which account for 74 per cent ($25.5 billion) of the global market, US market was the largest with 64.5 per cent share ($16,434 million). The five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) had 27 per cent ($6,882 million) and JapanUS and the five EU markets have shown strong growth over the period 2004-07. However, with a CAGR of only 0.5 per cent , the Japanese market has remained flat over the same period. The top five neurological drugs companies-as measured in terms of 2007 revenues in the seven major markets-account for just over 43per cent of the total $34.50 billion 2007 neurological drug sales. accounted for 8.5 per cent ($2,178 million). Both the

“The central nervous system (CNS) market in India is estimated to be around Rs 1,200 crore ($275 million), with major players in this segment being Sun Pharmaceuticals, Torrent Pharma, Abbot India, and Lundbeck India. Other players which are making major inroads into this market are Intas Pharmaceuticals, Micro and Sanofi-Synthelabo India, USV and Elder Pharmaceuticals,” says Nallaparaju.

Common disorders

Common neurological disorders include epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, insomnia, cerebrovascular diseases including stroke, migraine and other headache disorders, neuroinfections, brain tumours, traumatic disorders of the nervous system such as brain trauma, and neurological disorders as a result of malnutrition. The existing therapies for the some of the disorders are as follows:

Epilepsy-Epilepsy can be controlled with medication, but not cured, although surgery may be considered in difficult cases. There are about 12-14 drugs available in the market to treat epilepsy, which is characterised by recurrent unprovoked seizures-transient signs and/or symptoms due to abnormal, excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. “Sodium valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, topiramate and leveritacetam (last three being newer drugs) are some of the most commonly used treatments. These drugs may work for some and not for others. Often even the newer drugs fail,” says Dr Joy Desai, Consultant Neurologist, Jaslok Hospital, Mumbai.

Multiple sclerosis (MS)-MS is an auto immune brain targeted inflammatory disease in which the body’s immune system changes and identifies the brain structures as being foreign, and therefore it attacks it. “MS may cause attacks that may lead to numbness is limbs, paralysis, visual, urinary or speech problems. So during the acute attack you are supposed to suppress it by giving an immunosuppressant, which commonly is intravenous (IV) steroids, which helps for the time being but after a few months the attacks recur someplace else in the body,” informs Desai. Every attack leaves behind a disability which may be profound and may disallow a person from normal vision, imbalance etc. He adds, “To make sure that these recurring attacks die down you need an immunomodulator, which modulates the immune system such that it stops attacking itself too often. In the case of MS, immunomodulators that are currently in use are interferons.”

Alzheimer’s disease-The basic reason why Alzheimer’s disease occurs is due to the depletion of a chemical called acetylcholine in the fundamental circuits that sub serve memory registration and retrieval. And if you supplement a drug that can augment the amount of acetylcholine in the brain then memory improves. “There is no absolute cure, but there are three medications that have been licensed for treatment to help their symptoms of the disease-rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine,” says Desai. Aricept (donepezil hydrochloride), produced by Eisai and co-marketed with Pfizer, was the first drug to be licensed in the UK specifically for Alzheimer’s disease, followed by Exelon (rivastigmine) by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Reminyl (galantamine), co-developed by Shire Pharmaceuticals and the Janssen Research Foundation, and Ebixa (memantine), produced by Merz and marketed in Europe by Lundbeck, which is the newest of the Alzheimer’s drugs.

Parkinson’s disease-Treatment for Parkinson’s has evolved considerably over the last three decades. Existing treatments day can improve symptoms, delay onset of total physical dependence, hence delaying morbidity and mortality, which result due to progressive immobility. Levodopa (also called L-dopa) is the most commonly prescribed and most effective medication for controlling the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, particularly bradykinesia (slow movement) and rigidity. L-dopa is taken in combination with carbidopa (Sinemet) to increase its effectiveness and prevent or lessen side effects. Other treatments are dopamine agonists (Parlodel, Permax, Requip, Mirapex)-that activate dopamine receptor-taken alone or in combination with sinemet. Requip and Mirapex are newer medications, which are safer and more effective than the older drugs, Parlodel and Permax. Symmetrel, anticholinergics (artane, cogentin), eldepryl or deprenyl, Tasmar and Comtan (COMT Inhibitors) are other treatments for Parkinson’s.

Orphan neurological disorders-Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS/Motor neuron disease) and Huntington’s disease (HD) are two orphan neurological disorders. ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease and Maladie de Charcot, is a progressive neurodegenerative disease associated with the loss of upper and lower motor neurons. “Sanofi-Aventis’s Rilutek (riluzole) is the leading drug for ALS. Rilutek accounted for 84 per cent of the total ALS market value in 2006, across the seven major markets. Other drug classes, such as antidepressants and antispasm agents, are prescribed to treat specific symptoms and co-morbidities,” informs Nallaparaju.

HD, on the other hand, is an autosomal dominant, inherited, neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatry disease which gives rise to progressive motor, cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Nallaparaju says, “Current pharmacological therapy of HD is limited to the management or alleviation of associated neurobehavioral or movement abnormalities. The market is almost entirely composed of off-label prescribing of narcoleptics, antidepressants and anti-Parkinson’s drugs. Due to the comparatively cheap and highly genericised nature of these drug classes, the value in the six major markets (US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) reached only $24 million in 2007.”

Top 10 neurological brands in the seven major markets (based on the last three quarter sales in 2006) are-Aricept for Alzheimer’s (patent expiring in 2010); Topamax for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008); Lamictal for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008); Ambien for insomnia (patent expired); Depakote for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008); Avonex for MS (patent expiring in 2013); Lyrica for epilepsy (patent expiring in 2018), Copaxone for MS (patent expiring in 2014); Imitrex for migraine (patent expiring in 2008); and Kepprafor epilepsy (patent expiring in 2008. With some drug patents expiring this year and in the near future, the prospects of getting cheaper, and hence, more accessibility are bright.

“Among the top 10 neurological brands across the seven major markets, the leading drug class is anticonvulsants (Topamax, Lamictal, Depakote, Lyrica and Keppra). These are also approved for a number of psychiatric and pain indications, which significantly broadens their target patient population,” says Nallaparaju. Among the anticonvulsants, Pfizer’s Lyrica is the fastest growing neurological drug with a CAGR of approximately 400 per cent (2004-2007) and it sustained this rapid growth in 2006-07 with an annual growth of 50.7 per cent . “Five of the top 10 products are getting off-patent this year. With formulation and development expertise, global presence, and competitive pricing, Indian companies are poised to target the $8.8 billion market of these five drugs getting genericised,” he adds.

Current ongoing research

“For epilepsy, we are doing clinical research for new drugs, mostly because there are patients that need them following the failure of standard treatments. These trials are sponsored by UCB,” reveals Desai. “We have a new anti-epileptic drug called brivaracetam (generic), which is a new compound developed by UCB. Right now we are doing phase III for brivaracetam for epilepsy patients who are not responding to standard treatment,” he adds. The drug may be put up for FDA licensing in 2010, so it might come into the market internationally by 2011. Johnson & Johnson is also developing a drug called carisbamate that it thinks is very promising, which may hit the market by 2010.

For MS there are newer immunomodulators that may be available two or three years from now. “There is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) called tysabri (natalizumab), which is undergoing studies in Europe and the US. Initially, when the drug was developed, there were two patients who had a very disastrous side effect and died-a condition called progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). It has not happened again but it can be considered as a possible side effect. In all likelihood the drug will still get licensed,” says Desai.

There is a vaccine that is being studied for Alzheimer’s-beta amyloid vaccine. There is an abnormal deposition of a protein called beta amyloid (present in many structures of the nervous system) which, in Alzheimer’s, goes under a structural change and gets deposited as a pathological process and forms what is known as neuritic plaque. So to target this part of the pathology researchers are trying to target a vaccine which can block the beta amyloid from getting deposited in the brain. However, according to a recent study by researchers in University of California (in the Journal of Neuroscience), the vaccine does what it is designed to do-clear beta-amyloid plaques from the brain-but does not seem to help restore lost learning and memory abilities, hence the need for complementary treatments that would be able to address the complexity of Alzheimer’s disease.

Another significant development in Alzheimer’s R&D is the recent liscencing deal between Pfizer and Medivation (a San Fransisco based biopharmaceutical company) to co-develop and market Medivation’s drug Dimebon for Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease, which is currently in phase III trials. The results from the study should be out by 2010.

In mid 2007, a study featured in the journal Nature stated that a team of researchers at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine had found that isradipine, a drug widely used for hypertension and stroke, could restore dopamine neurons to their original healthy state in mice, hence benefiting susceptible cases of Parkinson’s as well as those who are already affected by the disease. Another drug has been very recently found to slow the progression of Parkinson’s. Researchers from Newcastle University found that rasagiline (also known as Azilect) can slow the development of the disease if given at an early stage. Both the above mentioned studies cannot be termed as conclusive; however, they do raise expectations of a new treatment for the disease.

There any other known and promising neurological drugs as well that are currently undergoing clinical trials in various companies.

Issues and trends

There are quite a few issues and limitations that pharma companies face in the R&D of neurological drugs across disorders. “Considering that among the top 10 products five of them are getting off-patent this year, new drug launches in the same therapy classes of these drugs are bound to get affected,” reveals Nallaparaju. He continues, “The reduced cash flow (from lower revenue realisation) will adversely affect investments in R&D. There are chances of potential failure in the clinical trials, and availability of limited patient population (for recruiting in trials) of ALS and Huntington’s disease.” Additionally, he says that since novel therapies like cell therapy/gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease are still in initial stages of development, it is likely that there would be regulatory resistance to the acceptance of such novel therapies.

There have also been controversies regarding the teratogenicity of some of the neurological drugs. For instance, carbamazepine has a potential teratogenic risk. A number of reports have described a slight increase in the risk of major congenital abnormalities, especially neural tube defects, among children of mothers with epilepsy treated with carbamazepine during pregnancy. If women are treated with a combination of carbamazepine and other anti-epileptic drugs, particularly sodium valproate, there is an increased risk without any doubt.

A new trend that is surfacing is the overlap of neurology and psychiatry, because of which there may be a dual approach required/implemented soon to deal with neurological disorders. “Because some of the psychiatric drugs are being used off-label in neurological disorders, this is quite possible. Also, some psychiatric drugs will be used in these conditions for the co-morbidities that the patients may be present with,” says Nallaparaju.

Desai concurs, ” Most of the anti epileptics are being used by psychiatrists to treat bipolar mood disorder based on the theory that bipolar depression is a sort of limbic epilepsy (epilepsy of emotions).” For example, sodium valproate is used off-licence by specialists as a mood stabiliser for treating people with the psychiatric illness, bipolar affective disorder. This use is not licensed, but the medicine has been shown to be effective for controlling episodes of mania in this condition, and for helping prevent future episodes of ill health. To understand better cases like how sodium valproate works as a mood stabiliser in bipolar disorder, neurologists and psychiatrists ought to work together.

Unmet needs

Globally, about 94 companies are developing products for various neurological disorders. From amongst them, some Indian companies like Glenmark are developing drugs for indications like migraine (pipeline drug-GRC6211). Glenmark has partnered with Eli-Lilly for development deals. Suven Life sciences has also partnered with Eli-Lilly.

As neurological disorders are age-related, an increasing ageing population will drive the growth of the market, and hence the R&D. The following indications posses high levels of unmet needs:

Alzheimer’s disease affects approximately 24 million people worldwide today, with the number predicted to reach 40 million by 2020. Further, current therapy has a modest symptomatic effect and does not significantly modify the course of this progressive neuro-degenerative disorder

There is a significant need for an MS treatment with superior efficacy to current therapies with a less invasive and less time-consuming route of administration. There is also an unmet need for primary-progressive and secondary-progressive MS indications

There is also need for a reduced dosing frequency or a less invasive therapy with good patient compliance

In novel therapies for Parkinson’s like cell therapy/gene therapy, initial studies have shown significant results in slowing the progression of the disease, this area needs to be explored more extensively.

Searching for the ‘Ideal’

“Philosophically, I think most disease cannot be reversed, you can only buy time. The key to developing new drugs for these disorders is to know what goes wrong and try to formulate a fix,” says Desai. He adds, “The problem in degenerative disease is that we only know what happens as an end result, but we haven’t yet understood what initiates it. If one can find the initiative event that triggers the disease chain, we can come close to finding a better treatment if not a cure.”

Each drug is different. Desai says, “We need a medication that can be given orally and at the same time can pass the blood brain barrier and reach the nervous system to the target because the target is itself protected by the blood brain barrier.” Another attribute can be that the drug should be specifically targeted, act only at the site where it is needed, for example it should only augment acetylcholine in the brain where it is needed and not else where in the body and produce side effects. “A drug that can reach the nervous system without losing its potency and has minimum side effects is what you are looking for,” he says. Unfortunately, neurological diseases are so many that it will be difficult to form a common umbrella to give attributes to a drug and call it ‘ideal’.

Source: Express Healthcare

Popularity: 27% [?]

Alzheimer’s disease: approaching time zero

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


It is well known that Alzheimer’s disease is a devastating condition that is becoming a major concern to aging people. It may not be as feared as cancer but the numbers are not lying, we are steadily advancing towards a new epidemic with the potential to severely affect the healthcare systems of all countries. This fact has been recently highlighted by 2 reports concerning the latest estimates of worldwide prevalence{1} and the economic projections of treatments that delay onset of Alzheimer’s disease{2} in US.

According to these reports:

  • 26.6 million people worldwide are living with Alzheimer’s and 5.1 of those live in the US.
  • These numbers are expected to quadruple by 2050. It is estimated that more than 106 million people will suffer from Alzheimer’s worldwide 16 million of which will reside in the US.
  • Assuming that treatments that could delay onset of the disease will be available by 2010 when the annual cost (Medicare only) is estimated to be $160 billion, it is estimated that by 2050 :
    • treatments delaying the onset of the disease by 1 year could save $1.2 trillion annually in US only, while at the same time they could reduce the number of patients by 12 million people, globally.
    • treatments delaying the onset of the disease by 2 years could reduce the number of patients by 18 million people globally.
    • treatments delaying the onset of the disease major symptoms by 5 years could save $4 trillion in US annually.

It is obvious that the combination of increasing costs and number of patients is already putting pressure to the pharmaceutical industry for real and effective treatment options for Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, healthcare systems like NICE seem unwilling to cover the prescription of expensive drugs that only treat symptoms. The time for innovation is here and is becoming imperative.

Are the scientific community and the pharmaceutical industry ready to provide with true solutions? Are they ready to offer treatment? It is generally believed that with advances made in research and drug development new disease modifying treatments should hit the market by 2010. Currently available drugs only treat symptoms. They protect the proper propagation of neuronal signals either with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine) or with NMDA receptor antagonists (Memantine). Both approaches, however, have nothing to do with the root of the disease. They simply improve for a short period of time the quality of life of affected individuals but the inevitable neurodegeneration is still active.

Which is the root of the disease? What causes Alzheimer’s disease? Definite answers to these questions are still pending. The widely adopted hypothesis suggests that aggregation of amyloid-beta peptides around neurons cause oxidative stress which in turn is responsible for the neurodegeneration and the cognitive problems that are characteristic in Alzheimer’s. Recently, an increasingly vocal portion of the scientific community claims that amyloid-beta accumulation is simply a pathologoanatomic hallmark of the disease and is preceded by oxidative stress and inflammation{3,4,5}. The latter two are believed to be the true pathogenic events for Alzheimer’s, a claim supported by many published results. It is interesting that:

  • Cognitively intact aged individuals have been found with Amyloid-beta loads equivalent to patients with Alzheimer’s disease{6}.
  • Amyloid-beta peptides, at low concentrations and before their accumulation into plaques act in a protective way against oxidative stress. However, when they form plaques, an event that is observed at later stages of Alzheimer’s disease they become toxic and induce oxidative stress{4}.
  • A recent study has shown that even though currently available cholinesterase inhibitor drugs may reduce the amount of amyloid-beta they are still unable to offer substantial benefit in terms of treatment{7}.

Based on the above, one could assume that the recent trend of Pharma industry towards amyloid-beta lowering drugs (antibodies, vaccines, β- and γ- secretase inhibitors and other amyloid-beta reducing compounds) may not be the best approach. Moreover, there may be a chance that attacking amyloid-beta may do more harm than good since it may sequester a natural defensive mechanism against oxidative stress{8}.

A smarter approach would be to target the probable main cause of the disease, namely oxidative stress and inflammation, with ultimate goal the true neuroprotection. Very few companies are currently in this path. An even better approach would be to combine the above with memory enhancing capabilities probably with a drug that has multiple targets or with a combination of drugs.

{1}Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease” published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia, July 2007, vol 3, no 3

{2}Saving Lives, Saving Money: Dividends for Americans Investing in Alzheimer Research. A report from the Lewin Group, commissioned by the Alzheimer’s Association. Washington, D.C.: 2004.

{3}Castellani et al., 2006, “Neuropathology of Alzheimer disease: pathognomonic but not pathogenic.” Acta Neuropathol, 111:503-509

{4}Castellani et al., 2006, “Antioxidant protection and neurodegenerative disease: The role of Amyloid-β and tau.” Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 21(2): 126-130

{5}Nunomura et al., 2006, “Involvement of oxidative stress in Alzheimer Disease.” J Neuropahtol Exp Neurol., 65(7):631-641.

{6}Davis et al., 1999, “Alzheimer neuropathologic alterations in aged cognitively normal subjects.” J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58:376-388

{7}Ballard C.G. et al., 2007, “Cholinesterase inhibitors reduce cortical Abeta in dementia with Lewy bodies.” Neurology, 68: 1726-1729.

{8}Obrenovich et al., 2002, “Amyloid-b: a (life) preserver for the brain.” Neurobiol. Aging, 23:1097-1099

Source: PharmaFeed

Popularity: 7% [?]

Site Sponsors